Solutions

The same product at one unit and at five hundred.

Property software usually asks you to pick a size and then punishes you for changing it. Linear pricing and a single permanent record remove that decision: starting small does not mean paying for a portfolio you do not have, and growing does not mean migrating into a different product.

Three shapes

What actually differs between them.

Not the features — those are identical, because there is one plan. What differs is which problem is expensive at your size.

One unit

The owner who never meant to be a landlord

A condo you moved out of. An inherited house. One door, and no intention of buying software.

Every platform on the market prices for a portfolio you do not have, so you run it on a spreadsheet, a folder of photos and your phone. Here one unit is a complete account: self-management is a real state in the model, not a gap where a manager should be.

What changes at this size

  • You hold every role yourself, on one account
  • No manager, and the product says unassigned instead of guessing
  • The record starts the day you add the property

39.90 a month, and the second property is still included

Small portfolio

Three to fifteen doors, no office

You manage your own units, maybe a relative units, and you are the whole operation.

The problem at this size is not capability, it is memory. Enough is happening that you cannot hold it, and not enough to justify a system priced for a company. The marginal property here costs less than a coffee, so growing never means crossing a threshold that doubles the bill.

What changes at this size

  • Vendors and tenants connect without adding to your bill
  • Repair history stops living in your head
  • Adding a door is an incremental charge, not a new tier

10 properties is 63.82 a month, all in

Management company

A team, owners to answer to, and turnover

Staff who come and go, owners who ask questions, vendors who need dispatching.

At this size the expensive problem is handoffs. A manager leaves and takes context with them; an owner asks what happened in 2022 and the answer left with somebody else. The record outlasts every relationship attached to it, and team authority is granted explicitly rather than inherited from a job title.

What changes at this size

  • Team grants that can be held and restored, with lineage
  • Representative handoff without rewriting historical attribution
  • Owner approvals that carry the estimate that produced them

You pay for properties under management, never per seat

What never changes

Four constants across every size.

A product that behaves differently for small customers is two products, and the small one is always the neglected one. These hold identically at one door and at five hundred.

The same record

One unit and five hundred units write to the same permanent property record, which cannot be deleted by anyone and never recycles its identifier.

The same rules

Authority is explicit at every size. The single owner is not handed a simplified product where the guardrails were removed to make it feel easier.

The same account

One login carries every role you hold. Owning here, renting there and doing work somewhere else is a workspace switch, not three sets of credentials.

No migration later

Growing from one door to forty changes the invoice and nothing else. There is no upgrade, no re-implementation and no export-and-reimport into the grown-up version.

By role

Or come at it from where you sit.

The same product, described from each side of the same repair.

Owners

What a manager cannot do without you, and what reaches you instead of daily operations.

Managers

The day arriving assembled, and a team whose authority is granted rather than inherited.

Tenants

Seeing the answer without asking, and the rules written in the tenant favour.

Vendors

A job packet before the drive, and an estimate that survives the whole decision.

OwnersManagersTenantsVendors

Early access

Start at whatever size you actually are.

One property is a complete account, and the account does not change shape when the portfolio does.

Request early accessLogin